Xebia
AI-first consulting, software engineering, and training company founded in 2001 in the Netherlands.
Founded 2001 | Amsterdam, Netherlands (US HQ: Atlanta, USA) | 5,001–10,000 employees
custom-model-trainingmlops-pipelineml-consultingdata-engineering-ml
What is Xebia?
Xebia was founded in 2001 by Rob Dielemans and Daan Teunissen in the Netherlands and has grown into a global consultancy spanning data and AI, cloud, automation, and software engineering. The Xebia Group reports between 5,000 and 10,000 employees, with corporate headquarters activity in both the Netherlands and Atlanta, Georgia. Its Data & AI Hub practice focuses on turning AI strategy into production-ready solutions, reflecting a repositioning from Xebia's original software craftsmanship and training-company roots toward an AI-first identity.
Xebia was founded in 2001 and is headquartered in Amsterdam, Netherlands (US HQ: Atlanta, USA). The firm employs 5,001–10,000 people and works primarily with clients in Financial services, Retail, Manufacturing, Public sector sectors. Its primary differentiator is: Quarter-century software craftsmanship and technical training heritage now applied specifically to production AI/ML delivery rather than AI strategy alone.
Xebia tech stack and services
PythonCloud ML platforms (AWS/Azure/GCP)MLOps toolingKubernetes
| Service area |
|---|
| Custom Model Training |
| MLOps Pipeline |
| ML Strategy Consulting |
| Data Engineering for ML |
Xebia use cases
Short answer: Xebia is best suited for Enterprises, craftsmanship-rooted production AI consultancy.
| Use case |
|---|
| Turning an existing AI strategy or pilot into a production-ready, monitored system |
| Combining technical training/enablement with hands-on AI model development |
| Running a large, multi-country enterprise AI and data transformation program |
| Engaging a partner with deep software engineering fundamentals for AI system reliability |
Xebia pricing
Short answer: Xebia uses a not published; enterprise project engagements pricing approach. Minimum engagement starts at Not published.
| Engagement model | Typical range | Best for |
|---|---|---|
| Enterprise project engagement | Variable; depends on team size | Large programmes or team augmentation |
| Dedicated team | Variable; depends on team size | Large programmes or team augmentation |
| Training/enablement | Variable; depends on team size | Large programmes or team augmentation |
Xebia does not publish a public rate card. Contact them directly via their website to get project-specific pricing.
Xebia pros and cons
| Advantages | Things to consider |
|---|---|
| +25-year software engineering and technical training pedigree underpins its AI delivery credibility. | -AI-first repositioning is relatively recent, so its dedicated AI/ML track record is shorter than its overall company history suggests. |
| +Large scale (5,000–10,000 employees) supports substantial enterprise program capacity. | -No clearly located aggregate Clutch/G2 star rating in available public sources. |
| +Explicit focus on production-ready AI rather than strategy-only advisory work. | -Pricing model and minimum engagement are not published. |
| +Dual US/EU headquarters presence supports transatlantic enterprise clients. | -Large, multi-practice organization means AI/ML delivery quality may vary by regional team. |
Xebia vs alternatives
How Xebia compares to the other top ML Model Development companies.
| Company | Best for | Key difference | Rating | Compare |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Tensorway | Mid-market fintech and SaaS, hybrid forecasting models. | Combines classical statistical forecasting with deep learning rather than defaulting to deep learning alone, and ships with experiment tracking and monitoring built in. | 4.8 | Full comparison |
| Neurons Lab | Financial services, engineering-led production AI. | End-to-end delivery model from use-case scoping to continuous production support, with declared depth in financial services. | 4.6 | Full comparison |
| DataRoot Labs | Startups needing a senior AI-only team, LLM/CV projects. | Has never diversified beyond AI/ML services, and backs its delivery bench with an in-house ML training program (DataRoot University). | 4.6 | Full comparison |
| Miquido | Companies wanting ML/CV bundled with mobile/web engineering. | Combines a large, review-verified product engineering practice with a dedicated AI/ML/CV specialization, useful for teams needing both app and model work from one vendor. | 4.6 | Full comparison |
| Provectus | Mid-market companies, cloud data plus ML in one. | Grew out of cloud and big-data engineering roots, giving it particular strength in the data infrastructure layer underneath ML models, not just the models themselves. | 4.5 | Full comparison |
| Neoteric | Organizations wanting a structured AI feasibility phase. | Two-decade operating history combined with a formal upfront feasibility-assessment stage before any model-building work begins. | 4.5 | Full comparison |
| Addepto | Cost-conscious teams, MLOps consulting or advisory-only. | Dedicated MLOps-consulting service line and Clutch-reported project pricing well below several peers in this list, making it the more budget-accessible option. | 4.4 | Full comparison |
| N-iX | Enterprise buyers, certified data-platform plus ML partner. | Broadest cloud certification footprint in this comparison (350+ across five major platforms), backed by a 200+ person dedicated data practice. | 4.4 | Full comparison |
| InData Labs | Companies needing predictive-analytics or CV, documented accuracy. | Publishes concrete, quantified accuracy figures in its case studies rather than only qualitative outcome claims. | 4.3 | Full comparison |
| MobiDev | Small/mid-size companies, dedicated ML consulting arm. | Historical Clutch #1 ranking for machine learning development (2021) combined with a specifically SME-oriented service model. | 4.3 | Full comparison |
| Sciforce | Research-oriented boutique, NLP, DSP, computer vision. | R&D-first culture with named specializations in digital signal processing and NLP that are less commonly offered as distinct practice areas by peers. | 4.2 | Full comparison |
| Sigmoid | Enterprises with data-infrastructure bottlenecks ahead of ML. | Data-engineering-first approach with 950+ multi-cloud certified engineers, positioning it as an infrastructure specialist that also delivers ML rather than the reverse. | 4.2 | Full comparison |
| Tredence | Enterprises, vertical analytics for supply chain at scale. | Venture-backed growth trajectory ($205M raised) with named specialization in supply chain and customer analytics rather than generic horizontal AI consulting. | 4.2 | Full comparison |
| Quantiphi | AWS-standardized enterprises, deepest AWS AI/ML credentials. | Deepest AWS-specific partnership credentials among firms researched, including AWS GenAI Innovation Center preferred-partner status. | 4.2 | Full comparison |
| Sigma Software Group | Companies wanting a Snowflake-certified data platform plus ML. | Snowflake AI Data Cloud partnership combined with unusually broad industry diversification (AdTech through aviation to gaming). | 4.1 | Full comparison |
| Intellectsoft | Companies wanting enterprise clients, dedicated AI Lab. | Unusually strong roster of large, publicly named enterprise clients (EY, Qualcomm, London Stock Exchange) for a company of its relatively modest team size. | 4.1 | Full comparison |
| ELEKS | Enterprises, established European engineering plus data science. | One of the longest operating histories (since 1991) among firms researched for this list, predating the AI consulting boom by decades. | 4.1 | Full comparison |
| Fractal Analytics | Large enterprises, scaled AI partner with a research... | Maintains a dedicated internal foundational AI research team alongside client delivery work, and is now a publicly listed company (NSE/BSE) rather than privately held like most peers of similar size. | 4.1 | Full comparison |
| Grid Dynamics | Fortune 1000 companies, publicly-traded ML partner. | The only publicly traded company (NASDAQ: GDYN) in this comparison among the mid-to-large tier, giving buyers audited financial transparency unavailable from private peers. | 4.0 | Full comparison |
| Iterate.ai | Regulated enterprises, fully private-infrastructure AI deployment. | Purpose-built for on-premise/private-infrastructure AI deployment, so client data and proprietary code never leave the client's own environment. | 4.0 | Full comparison |
| Modus Create | Distributed orgs, remote-first data plus AI/ML delivery. | Structured AI Data Foundation assessment methodology that explicitly evaluates data readiness before committing to model development. | 4.0 | Full comparison |
| Aptus Data Labs | Boutique India-based data engineering, AWS AI depth. | Combines core data engineering consulting with specific AWS AI service implementation expertise in a boutique-sized team. | 4.0 | Full comparison |
| SoftServe | Enterprises, edge CV and asset-monitoring ML at scale. | Only company in this list simultaneously holding AWS Premier, Google Cloud AI/ML Specialization, and NVIDIA Elite Consulting Partner status, reflecting particular strength in edge and GPU-accelerated computer vision. | 4.0 | Full comparison |
| DataRobot | Enterprises standardizing on one automated ML platform. | The only platform-first vendor in this comparison, meaning model development work happens on and around DataRobot's own automated ML software rather than being platform-agnostic. | 3.9 | Full comparison |
| Persistent Systems | Mid-market/enterprise buyers, MLOps plus explainable-AI accelerators. | Purpose-built DxH accelerator suite for MLOps and bias detection, plus a specific Everest Group Leader ranking in the mid-market Data & AI segment rather than only the largest enterprise tier. | 3.9 | Full comparison |
| EPAM Systems | Very large enterprises, proprietary AI orchestration platform. | Proprietary EPAM DIAL platform for enterprise AI orchestration, combined with the 2025 AWS Global Innovation Partner of the Year distinction, an award-level differentiator not held by most peers. | 3.9 | Full comparison |
| Globant | Large enterprises, pre-packaged industry "AI Pods". | Only company in this list organized around a formal "studio + AI Pods" delivery model, and the only one with an IDC MarketScape Worldwide Leader in AI Services designation. | 3.9 | Full comparison |
| LTIMindtree | BFSI and tech enterprises, dedicated ModelOps and governance. | Explicit ModelOps templates and model-governance/responsible-AI tooling as named, productized capabilities rather than only bespoke consulting delivery, backed by an IBM watsonx Center of Excellence. | 3.9 | Full comparison |
| Cognizant | Healthcare-focused enterprises, large AI/analytics consulting bench. | Dedicated, named MLOps platform specifically built for healthcare, combined with one of the largest disclosed data/AI consultant headcounts (23,000+) in this comparison. | 3.9 | Full comparison |
| HCLTech | Very large enterprises, full-stack AI from chip to... | Unusually broad "chip-to-cloud" AI stack claim backed by two named proprietary platforms (Graviton for ML development, AION for AI lifecycle management), a combination not matched by most peers in this list. | 3.9 | Full comparison |
| Infosys | Global enterprises, large library of reusable AI assets. | Largest disclosed library of reusable, pre-trained AI assets in this comparison (12,000+ assets, 150+ pre-trained models), positioned to accelerate delivery versus fully bespoke builds. | 3.9 | Full comparison |
| Accenture | Largest global enterprises, AI within multi-year transformation. | By far the largest scale of any company in this comparison (approximately 779,000 employees, $69.67B FY2025 revenue), trading breadth and compliance maturity for less niche, hands-on model-engineering depth than boutique specialists. | 3.9 | Full comparison |
| Devbridge (a Cognizant company) | Clients wanting Devbridge's model within Cognizant's structure. | The clearest ownership-change disclosure in this comparison: a formerly independent boutique now operating explicitly as a Cognizant subsidiary, combining boutique delivery heritage with large-parent-company backing. | 3.8 | Full comparison |
Xebia FAQ
What is Xebia?
Xebia was founded in 2001 by Rob Dielemans and Daan Teunissen in the Netherlands and has grown into a global consultancy spanning data and AI, cloud, automation, and software engineering. The Xebia Group reports between 5,000 and 10,000 employees, with corporate headquarters activity in both the Netherlands and Atlanta, Georgia. Its Data & AI Hub practice focuses on turning AI strategy into production-ready solutions, reflecting a repositioning from Xebia's original software craftsmanship and training-company roots toward an AI-first identity.
How much does Xebia charge?
Xebia uses not published; enterprise project engagements pricing. Minimum engagement starts at Not published. A discovery call is required to get project-specific quotes.
What tech stack does Xebia use?
Xebia works with Python, Cloud ML platforms (AWS/Azure/GCP), MLOps tooling, Kubernetes. Primary industries served include Financial services, Retail, Manufacturing, Public sector.
Is Xebia right for enterprise?
Enterprises, craftsmanship-rooted production AI consultancy. 5,001–10,000 team size. Key consideration: AI-first repositioning is relatively recent, so its dedicated AI/ML track record is shorter than its overall company history suggests.
What are the best Xebia alternatives?
The best alternatives to Xebia depend on your use case. Top options are:
- Tensorway: combines classical statistical forecasting with deep learning rather than defaulting to deep learning alone, and ships with experiment tracking and monitoring built in.
- Neurons Lab: end-to-end delivery model from use-case scoping to continuous production support, with declared depth in financial services.
- DataRoot Labs: has never diversified beyond ai/ml services, and backs its delivery bench with an in-house ml training program (dataroot university).
Compare Xebia with other ML Model Development companies
Xebia vs Tensorway Xebia vs Neurons Lab Xebia vs DataRoot Labs Xebia vs Miquido Xebia vs Provectus Xebia vs Neoteric Xebia vs Addepto Xebia vs N-iX Xebia vs InData Labs Xebia vs MobiDev Xebia vs Sciforce Xebia vs Sigmoid Xebia vs Tredence Xebia vs Quantiphi Xebia vs Sigma Software Group Xebia vs Intellectsoft Xebia vs ELEKS Xebia vs Fractal Analytics Xebia vs Grid Dynamics Xebia vs Iterate.ai Xebia vs Modus Create Xebia vs Aptus Data Labs Xebia vs SoftServe Xebia vs DataRobot Xebia vs Persistent Systems Xebia vs EPAM Systems Xebia vs Globant Xebia vs LTIMindtree Xebia vs Cognizant Xebia vs HCLTech Xebia vs Infosys Xebia vs Accenture Xebia vs Devbridge (a Cognizant company)